* DiskonChip problems.
@ 2005-09-06 18:39 yahoo_groups
2005-09-08 10:16 ` David Woodhouse
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: yahoo_groups @ 2005-09-06 18:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mtd
I used to have DiskonChip stuff working on 2.4.18 kernel, but I've been forced to upgrade to 2.4.31 and now I can't get it to work.
I used to have a driver called fldrvlnx, which created a module called doc.o and I'd simply load that module and then I could mount the DiskonChip with a line in fstab like
/dev/fla1 /mnt/fla1 msdos defaults 0 0
Now I see in 2.4.31, things have moved on and the DiskonChip stuff is different. Can someone enlighten me as to how I'm supposed to get it to work ?
Thanks
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: DiskonChip problems.
2005-09-06 18:39 DiskonChip problems yahoo_groups
@ 2005-09-08 10:16 ` David Woodhouse
2005-09-08 18:23 ` yahoo_groups
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Woodhouse @ 2005-09-08 10:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: yahoo_groups; +Cc: linux-mtd
On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 18:39 +0000, yahoo_groups@rovoreed.com wrote:
> I used to have a driver called fldrvlnx, which created a module called
> doc.o and I'd simply load that module and then I could mount the
> DiskonChip with a line in fstab like
>
> /dev/fla1 /mnt/fla1 msdos defaults 0 0
You were using a binary-only module. If you were shipping embedded
products which used a combination of that and the GPL'd kernel, then you
were violating the GPL. You really shouldn't admit to such things in
public. I hope you were doing this only in your lab and not shipping
such code.
> Now I see in 2.4.31, things have moved on and the DiskonChip stuff is
> different. Can someone enlighten me as to how I'm supposed to get it
> to work ?
Enable the DOC2000 hardware driver and NFTL, and it should turn up
as /dev/nftla
--
dwmw2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: DiskonChip problems.
2005-09-08 10:16 ` David Woodhouse
@ 2005-09-08 18:23 ` yahoo_groups
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: yahoo_groups @ 2005-09-08 18:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mtd
On 8 Sep 2005 at 11:16, David Woodhouse wrote:
> You were using a binary-only module. If you were shipping embedded
> products which used a combination of that and the GPL'd kernel, then you
> were violating the GPL. You really shouldn't admit to such things in
> public. I hope you were doing this only in your lab and not shipping
> such code.
OK. I'm well aware of the GPL. I'm was not shipping anything. I was
just trying to prove to myself that the DOC (and hardware interface)
did work.
Anyway, thanks to your help I'm now using the kernel and modules
exclusively.
Thanks again.
Mike
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-09-08 18:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-09-06 18:39 DiskonChip problems yahoo_groups
2005-09-08 10:16 ` David Woodhouse
2005-09-08 18:23 ` yahoo_groups
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox