From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail2.extendcp.co.uk ([82.110.105.34]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.52 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1EDR1Y-0008Ex-Tt for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2005 14:21:38 -0400 Received: from dynamic-62-56-51-33.park-s46b.dslaccess.co.uk ([62.56.51.33] helo=GladysDNS) by mail2.extendcp.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.42) id 1EDQwu-00066a-En for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2005 19:16:36 +0100 From: yahoo_groups@rovoreed.com To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 18:23:19 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <43208197.21719.34982B@localhost> In-reply-to: <1126174618.4171.149.camel@baythorne.infradead.org> References: <431DE248.20912.15DAC1@localhost> Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body Subject: Re: DiskonChip problems. List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 8 Sep 2005 at 11:16, David Woodhouse wrote: > You were using a binary-only module. If you were shipping embedded > products which used a combination of that and the GPL'd kernel, then you > were violating the GPL. You really shouldn't admit to such things in > public. I hope you were doing this only in your lab and not shipping > such code. OK. I'm well aware of the GPL. I'm was not shipping anything. I was just trying to prove to myself that the DOC (and hardware interface) did work. Anyway, thanks to your help I'm now using the kernel and modules exclusively. Thanks again. Mike