From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [195.209.228.254] (helo=shelob.oktetlabs.ru) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.52 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1EDict-00067f-Lq for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2005 09:09:14 -0400 Message-ID: <4321894C.8050809@yandex.ru> Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 17:08:28 +0400 From: "Artem B. Bityuckiy" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Josh Boyer References: <42FB68AE.6070805@inf.u-szeged.hu> <20050815094816.GA27229@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> <43007773.2070602@yandex.ru> <43008129.2060303@inf.u-szeged.hu> <43008BFB.502@yandex.ru> <4300970E.2090803@inf.u-szeged.hu> <43009AE1.6010907@yandex.ru> <4301A259.3090304@yandex.ru> <1126186364.28995.10.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> <43203E13.3080204@yandex.ru> <20050908184326.GE20668@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> <1126270658.4491.8.camel@windu.rchland.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <1126270658.4491.8.camel@windu.rchland.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: zhao_fusheng@hotmail.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, David Woodhouse Subject: Re: JFFS2 eraseblock header List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Josh Boyer wrote: > > In any case, would you please bump the overall version of JFFS2 if this > change is made? I don't mean "JFFS3", I mean "JFFS2 version 2.3" or > similar. See super.c line 320 for where I'm talking about. Agree, this should be done. I also offered to introduce a version number byte to the erasebloch header. This is somewhat ugly but will help to quickly recognize the JFFS2 image version. In future this will help us. -- Best Regards, Artem B. Bityuckiy, St.-Petersburg, Russia.