From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [84.204.75.148] (helo=shelob.oktetlabs.ru) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.52 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1EFp50-0001Mb-NJ for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 04:27:01 -0400 Message-ID: <4329302A.4010300@yandex.ru> Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 12:26:18 +0400 From: "Artem B. Bityuckiy" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Menzebach References: <432812E8.2030807@mw-itcon.de> <432817FF.10307@yandex.ru> <4329251C.7050102@mw-itcon.de> <43292A8B.4020707@yandex.ru> <43292E94.4020702@mw-itcon.de> In-Reply-To: <43292E94.4020702@mw-itcon.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: data loss on jffs2 filesystem on dataflash List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Peter Menzebach wrote: > The chance is not too high ;) . > > I have done some further search... > Here one other patch for fix and the other is only for better look... > > Now I will do a little test again... > Oh, but you said JFFS2 worked with your dataflash for ages? How could it? -- Best Regards, Artem B. Bityuckiy, St.-Petersburg, Russia.