From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [195.209.228.254] (helo=shelob.oktetlabs.ru) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.52 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1EHfhR-0002lZ-St for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 06:50:18 -0400 Message-ID: <432FE1EF.9000807@yandex.ru> Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 14:18:23 +0400 From: "Artem B. Bityutskiy" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Menzebach References: <432812E8.2030807@mw-itcon.de> <432817FF.10307@yandex.ru> <4329251C.7050102@mw-itcon.de> <4329288B.8050909@yandex.ru> <43292AC6.40809@mw-itcon.de> <43292E16.70401@yandex.ru> <43292F91.9010302@mw-itcon.de> In-Reply-To: <43292F91.9010302@mw-itcon.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Linux MTD Subject: Re: data loss on jffs2 filesystem on dataflash List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Peter Menzebach wrote: > short note: The sector size is 1056 bytes, but I report 8*1056 or > 16*1056 byte to the mtd layer. As far as I see, this seems to be better > for jffs2, and otherwise I had to patch the mkfs.jffs2 every time I use > it ;) Hello Peter, I've returned to explore your problem. Do you have any success? I have a vague idea what happens, need to think a little. Unfortunately, I have no DataFlash to just debug this. Please, write me your flash name - I want to glance at its data sheet. Thanks, -- Best Regards, Artem B. Bityuckiy, St.-Petersburg, Russia.