From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [195.209.228.254] (helo=shelob.oktetlabs.ru) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.52 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1EHiYo-0006uT-W2 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 09:53:32 -0400 Message-ID: <43300C08.80005@yandex.ru> Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 17:18:00 +0400 From: "Artem B. Bityutskiy" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Menzebach References: <432812E8.2030807@mw-itcon.de> <432817FF.10307@yandex.ru> <4329251C.7050102@mw-itcon.de> <4329288B.8050909@yandex.ru> <43292AC6.40809@mw-itcon.de> <43292E16.70401@yandex.ru> <43292F91.9010302@mw-itcon.de> <432FE1EF.9000807@yandex.ru> <432FEF55.5090700@mw-itcon.de> <433006D8.4010502@yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <433006D8.4010502@yandex.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Linux MTD Subject: Re: data loss on jffs2 filesystem on dataflash List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Artem B. Bityutskiy wrote: > Peter Menzebach wrote: > >> No, not at then moment. If I have some time, I can try to rewrite the >> chipset driver, that it reports a sector size of 1024. > > > I glanced at the manual. Uhh, DataFlash is very specific beast. It > suppoers page program with built-in erase command... So DataFlash > effectively may be considered as a block device. Then you may use any FS > on it providing you have wrote proper driver? Why do you need JFFS2 then > :-) ? > > JFFS2 orients to "classical" flashes. They have no "write page with > built-in erase" operation. > > Didn't read the manual carefully, what do they refer by "Main memory > array"? > > BTW, having 8*1056 write buffer is not perfect ides, better make it as > small as possible, i.e., 1056 bytes. > Ups, I sent the mail to LKML instead of MTD ML by accident :-) -- Best Regards, Artem B. Bityuckiy, St.-Petersburg, Russia.