From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [195.209.228.254] (helo=shelob.oktetlabs.ru) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.52 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1EIjvy-0001Bc-KA for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 05:33:44 -0400 Message-ID: <4333CBCE.5000406@yandex.ru> Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 13:33:02 +0400 From: "Artem B. Bityutskiy" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ferenc Havasi References: <4333CAF3.3070004@inf.u-szeged.hu> In-Reply-To: <4333CAF3.3070004@inf.u-szeged.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: zhao forrest , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH]Erase block header(revision 1) List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Ferenc Havasi wrote: > I have only one big problem with this patch. I'm strongly against to > introduce INCOMPAT nodes JFFS2_NODETYPE_DIRENT_EBH and > JFFS2_NODETYPE_INODE_EBH just to make unusable new JFFS2 images for old > JFFS2 code on NAND devices, too. Do I understand well: is this the only > reason? Haven't we already noted/agreed that JFFS2_NODETYPE_DIRENT_EBH is ugly and should go away??? -- Best Regards, Artem B. Bityuckiy, St.-Petersburg, Russia.