From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from n1.cetrtapot.si ([212.30.80.17]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1EJnbn-00021F-Of for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 03:41:16 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.dmz.cetrtapot.si [127.0.0.1]) by n1.cetrtapot.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6044BB1D for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 09:40:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from n1.cetrtapot.si ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (n1.dmz.cetrtapot.si [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 34974-07 for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 09:40:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.1.1.75] (unknown [192.168.66.2]) by n1.cetrtapot.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42F6CBB5C for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 09:40:39 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4337A604.6050204@cetrtapot.si> Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 09:40:52 +0200 From: "hinko.kocevar@cetrtapot.si" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linux MTD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: fragtree method? List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hello all, We are using JFFS2 fs on toshiba NAND flash. There are several partitions defined, but scan time at boot time gets longer every day of usage. Eg. when flash is empty it takes ~10 s to mount 20Mb of flash in 3 partitions later when there are some files present it takes > 30s and increasing. We have April MTD branch and are currently going for newer version. We would also like to know if fragtree method posted by Artem in July [1] would be wise to add. If anyone has some experience with it, please, post it. [1] [PATCH] (preliminary) new fragtree build method 24.07.2005 regards, hinko k