From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [195.209.228.254] (helo=shelob.oktetlabs.ru) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.52 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1EJpZF-0006WQ-Sm for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 05:46:42 -0400 Message-ID: <4337C35C.6060007@yandex.ru> Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 13:46:04 +0400 From: "Artem B. Bityutskiy" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn_Engel?= References: <1127433949.6937.30.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050925150635.GD28978@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> <4337B727.2050809@yandex.ru> <20050926093440.GE17756@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> In-Reply-To: <20050926093440.GE17756@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] jffs2 whitespace List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , J=F6rn Engel wrote: > Because we want things like ebh, summary, xattr, etc.? If we accept > this patch, it makes life a bit worse for people who write the stuff > we want. It may be the straw that makes them go away and never come > back. Ok, but the patch also does the right thing, isn't it? Then let's get=20 determined with (1) will it be accepted at all and (2) when? --=20 Best Regards, Artem B. Bityuckiy, St.-Petersburg, Russia.