From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [195.209.228.254] (helo=shelob.oktetlabs.ru) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.52 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1EJwfp-0005c9-AY for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 13:22:02 -0400 Message-ID: <43382E0E.9040005@yandex.ru> Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 21:21:18 +0400 From: "Artem B. Bityutskiy" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Grayson References: <1127433949.6937.30.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050925150635.GD28978@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> <4337B727.2050809@yandex.ru> <20050926093440.GE17756@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> <4337C35C.6060007@yandex.ru> <20050926110150.GG17756@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> <1127755073.6937.74.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1127755073.6937.74.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] jffs2 whitespace List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Peter Grayson wrote: > On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 13:01 +0200, J=C3=B6rn Engel wrote: > I agree that other patches are more important than code formatting. > However, we may also enable more people to contribute to jffs2 if the > code is as readable/understandable as possible. I want to help make a > small, but tangible step in that direction. >=20 >=20 > Since there appears to be at least some benefit, maybe we can do this i= n > easy to digest pieces. I have made another patch just against the files= > concerning compression in jffs2. These files had a lot of problems and = I > do not believe they conflict with any of the main outstanding patches > (ebh, xattr, centsum). >=20 Wait a bit, I gonna just try those patches and check if there are actuall= y any big problem if they are applied above your patch. --=20 Best Regards, Artem B. Bityuckiy, St.-Petersburg, Russia.