From: "hinko.kocevar@cetrtapot.si" <hinko.kocevar@cetrtapot.si>
To: Ferenc Havasi <havasi@inf.u-szeged.hu>
Cc: Linux MTD <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Great jffs2 speedup
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 12:15:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <433BBED5.4040306@cetrtapot.si> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <433BA402.3040703@inf.u-szeged.hu>
Ferenc Havasi wrote:
>>We found sumtool utility in tools dir and if my understanding is
>>correct it is used to convert jffs2 image with no EBS to jffs2 image
>>with EBS.
>>
>>Is this the only way to upgrade 'old' jffs2 partitions already in
>>place (on the nand flash) to use EBS? Thing is, we have several system
>>up and running in the wild and would like to upgrade jffs2 partitions
>>as-painless-as-possible, preferably without complete reflash of the
>>systems.
>
>
> At this moment: yes, that is the only way.
Ok, just to be on the right track. I guess we will have to come up with
the solution using sumtool.
>
> Or you may try our other technique: CS (Centralized Summary). That
> technique does not requie user space tool, and cause very fast mount
> after any clean umount.
All of our umounts are unclean - or said better application is not
taking care of umount at all. System may be powered off anytime. Which
raises another question: Will this impact mount time in long run? Eg.
after more and more unclean (u)mounts should we expect significant
performance degradation?
regards,
hinko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-29 10:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-28 9:36 Great jffs2 speedup hinko.kocevar
2005-09-28 10:00 ` Jörn Engel
2005-09-28 15:26 ` hinko.kocevar
2005-09-29 7:53 ` Jörn Engel
2005-09-30 12:26 ` hinko.kocevar
2005-09-29 8:21 ` Ferenc Havasi
2005-09-29 9:34 ` Jörn Engel
2005-09-29 9:44 ` Artem B. Bityutskiy
2005-09-29 9:52 ` Ferenc Havasi
2005-09-29 9:55 ` Jörn Engel
2005-09-29 9:59 ` Artem B. Bityutskiy
2005-09-29 10:12 ` Jörn Engel
2005-09-29 10:21 ` Artem B. Bityutskiy
2005-09-29 10:26 ` Jörn Engel
2005-09-29 11:34 ` Ferenc Havasi
2005-09-29 11:35 ` Jörn Engel
2005-09-29 11:45 ` Ferenc Havasi
2005-09-29 11:52 ` Jörn Engel
2005-09-29 12:39 ` Josh Boyer
2005-09-29 10:23 ` Ferenc Havasi
2005-09-29 10:29 ` Jörn Engel
2005-09-29 10:45 ` Artem B. Bityutskiy
2005-09-29 11:29 ` Ferenc Havasi
2005-09-29 11:32 ` Artem B. Bityutskiy
2005-09-29 16:10 ` Peter Grayson
2005-09-29 17:45 ` Sergei Sharonov
2005-09-30 4:19 ` Peter Grayson
2005-09-30 8:58 ` Artem B. Bityutskiy
2005-09-30 9:08 ` Artem B. Bityutskiy
2005-09-30 20:25 ` Peter Grayson
2005-10-01 7:01 ` Artem B. Bityutskiy
2005-09-30 21:15 ` Sergei Sharonov
2005-09-30 23:22 ` Peter Grayson
2005-10-01 7:43 ` Artem B. Bityutskiy
2005-09-29 10:15 ` hinko.kocevar [this message]
2005-09-29 12:01 ` Ferenc Havasi
2005-09-29 13:07 ` Jörn Engel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=433BBED5.4040306@cetrtapot.si \
--to=hinko.kocevar@cetrtapot.si \
--cc=havasi@inf.u-szeged.hu \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox