From: Ferenc Havasi <havasi@inf.u-szeged.hu>
To: "Jörn Engel" <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>
Cc: "Artem B. Bityutskiy" <dedekind@yandex.ru>,
"hinko.kocevar@cetrtapot.si" <hinko.kocevar@cetrtapot.si>,
Linux MTD <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Great jffs2 speedup
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 13:34:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <433BD154.1050403@inf.u-szeged.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050929102620.GE18741@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>
Jörn Engel wrote:
>On Thu, 29 September 2005 14:21:21 +0400, Artem B. Bityutskiy wrote:
>
>
>>Jörn Engel wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Dummy argument. Wear levelling is just a means to avoid the real
>>>problem - early wear-out of specific blocks. Spending one erase block
>>>for cs is pretty sane, as long as this block doesn't wear-out well
>>>before the rest.
>>>
>>>
>>"As long as" is the essential part. If it is true - nice. In general
>>this can't be true. And, anticipating your remark, I agree that it still
>>may have its place. :-)
>>
>>
>
>Agreed. In general, this patch opens an option for a DoS attack.
>
>
Maybe I don't understand something. How makes CS possible DoS attacks?
Ferenc
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-29 11:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-28 9:36 Great jffs2 speedup hinko.kocevar
2005-09-28 10:00 ` Jörn Engel
2005-09-28 15:26 ` hinko.kocevar
2005-09-29 7:53 ` Jörn Engel
2005-09-30 12:26 ` hinko.kocevar
2005-09-29 8:21 ` Ferenc Havasi
2005-09-29 9:34 ` Jörn Engel
2005-09-29 9:44 ` Artem B. Bityutskiy
2005-09-29 9:52 ` Ferenc Havasi
2005-09-29 9:55 ` Jörn Engel
2005-09-29 9:59 ` Artem B. Bityutskiy
2005-09-29 10:12 ` Jörn Engel
2005-09-29 10:21 ` Artem B. Bityutskiy
2005-09-29 10:26 ` Jörn Engel
2005-09-29 11:34 ` Ferenc Havasi [this message]
2005-09-29 11:35 ` Jörn Engel
2005-09-29 11:45 ` Ferenc Havasi
2005-09-29 11:52 ` Jörn Engel
2005-09-29 12:39 ` Josh Boyer
2005-09-29 10:23 ` Ferenc Havasi
2005-09-29 10:29 ` Jörn Engel
2005-09-29 10:45 ` Artem B. Bityutskiy
2005-09-29 11:29 ` Ferenc Havasi
2005-09-29 11:32 ` Artem B. Bityutskiy
2005-09-29 16:10 ` Peter Grayson
2005-09-29 17:45 ` Sergei Sharonov
2005-09-30 4:19 ` Peter Grayson
2005-09-30 8:58 ` Artem B. Bityutskiy
2005-09-30 9:08 ` Artem B. Bityutskiy
2005-09-30 20:25 ` Peter Grayson
2005-10-01 7:01 ` Artem B. Bityutskiy
2005-09-30 21:15 ` Sergei Sharonov
2005-09-30 23:22 ` Peter Grayson
2005-10-01 7:43 ` Artem B. Bityutskiy
2005-09-29 10:15 ` hinko.kocevar
2005-09-29 12:01 ` Ferenc Havasi
2005-09-29 13:07 ` Jörn Engel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=433BD154.1050403@inf.u-szeged.hu \
--to=havasi@inf.u-szeged.hu \
--cc=dedekind@yandex.ru \
--cc=hinko.kocevar@cetrtapot.si \
--cc=joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox