From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [195.209.228.254] (helo=shelob.oktetlabs.ru) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.52 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ELcND-0000Fm-1n for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2005 04:06:37 -0400 Message-ID: <433E432B.7010406@yandex.ru> Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2005 12:04:59 +0400 From: "Artem B. Bityutskiy" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dsaxena@plexity.net References: <20051001050003.GD11137@plexity.net> <1128152797.3546.15.camel@sauron.oktetlabs.ru> <20051001080027.GM25424@plexity.net> In-Reply-To: <20051001080027.GM25424@plexity.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Linus Torvalds , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] [MTD] kmalloc + memzero -> kzalloc conversion List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Deepak Saxena wrote: > I see it more as an API usage cleanup then a "fix" of any sort. > Well, actually it may be helpful in only future, for example, if it is known that the allocated memory is zero-filled already, memzero() may be avoided at all. -- Best Regards, Artem B. Bityuckiy, St.-Petersburg, Russia.