From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [195.209.228.254] (helo=shelob.oktetlabs.ru) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.52 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1EMooo-0002Ik-Ut for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 11:35:15 -0400 Message-ID: <4342A0FC.3060602@yandex.ru> Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 19:34:20 +0400 From: "Artem B. Bityutskiy" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Menzebach References: <43429D54.5010103@mw-itcon.de> In-Reply-To: <43429D54.5010103@mw-itcon.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Linux MTD Subject: Re: size of ebs enabled image much bigger than original List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Peter Menzebach wrote: > The image before sumtool has a size of about 3.7Mb. After sumtool it has > 5,9 Mb > Is this "normal"? It is perfectly normal if the image becomes larger, but 60% looks too much... May be this is the result of small eraseblocks? -- Best Regards, Artem B. Bityuckiy, St.-Petersburg, Russia.