From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from www.mw-itcon.de ([213.146.115.73]) by canuck.infradead.org with smtp (Exim 4.52 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1EMozm-0002bx-DC for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 11:46:33 -0400 Message-ID: <4342A3CD.1080006@mw-itcon.de> Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 17:46:21 +0200 From: Peter Menzebach MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Artem B. Bityutskiy" References: <43429D54.5010103@mw-itcon.de> <4342A0FC.3060602@yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <4342A0FC.3060602@yandex.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Linux MTD Subject: Re: size of ebs enabled image much bigger than original List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Artem B. Bityutskiy wrote: > Peter Menzebach wrote: > >> The image before sumtool has a size of about 3.7Mb. After sumtool it >> has 5,9 Mb >> Is this "normal"? > > It is perfectly normal if the image becomes larger, but 60% looks too > much... > May be this is the result of small eraseblocks? > You are right. With 64K erasesize it gives about 3,7Mb -> 4.0Mb Thanks Peter -- Peter Menzebach Menzebach und Wolff IT-Consulting GbR Phone +49 751 355 387 1