From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [85.21.88.2] (helo=mail.dev.rtsoft.ru) by canuck.infradead.org with smtp (Exim 4.52 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1EOEfB-0000IT-7r for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2005 09:23:12 -0400 Message-ID: <4347C82A.3060209@ru.mvista.com> Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2005 17:22:50 +0400 From: Vitaly Wool MIME-Version: 1.0 To: tglx@linutronix.de References: <5080.61.95.208.3.1128750482.squirrel@61.95.208.3> <43479777.5060309@ru.mvista.com> <1128765885.1728.82.camel@tglx.tec.linutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <1128765885.1728.82.camel@tglx.tec.linutronix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: nreddy@netenrich.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: "Timing issue when we use SPANSION 8MB Flash" List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Thomas Gleixner wrote: >On Sat, 2005-10-08 at 13:55 +0400, Vitaly Wool wrote: > > >>Hi, >> >>am I right that it's a NOR flash? What's the reason for using JFFS2 on >>it then? >> >> > >Err, why shouldnt he use JFFS2 on NOR ? Is there a better suited file >system which can handle NOR FLASH? > >tglx > > > cramfs ;)