From: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com>
To: dedekind1@gmail.com
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: delayed close on mtdblock
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 10:22:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4352830.ZIZxnlTurK@ws-stein> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1326185675.8847.16.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>
On Tuesday 10 January 2012 10:54:35 Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 15:18 +0100, Alexander Stein wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I observed an somewhat interesting situation regarding mtdblock. I have
> > a NOR- Flash with several mtd partitions. One holds the configuration
> > from the bootloader and another one contains UBI/UBIFS.
> > During bootup I attach UBI and mount UBIFS, no problems so far. To read
> > the bootloader coniguration I open the corresponding mtdblock with
> > O_RDONLY, do an lseek, read and close it afterwards, nothing special.
> > But I noticed the close() call take >1s which seems to far big, as
> > there is nothing to be written into this mtdblock device.
> > I digged into the kernel and get to mtdblock_release(). I can see that
> > write_cached_data does nothing as the cache is clean. But mbd->mtd->sync
> > (cfi_amdstd_sync in my case) takes a while because the chip state is
> > currently FL_ERASING. The retry loop is taken several times before
> > exiting the function. If I don't mount UBIFS there is no such delay.
> > I'm wondering if there is actually a need to sync the chip if the cache
> > is clean. Can someone explain this to me?
>
> Most probably this is because NOR flash erase is very slow. You probably
> do writes to the UBIFS partition, which initiates many erase operations.
> When you close the mtdblock device - it syncs the flash chip which
> blocks until the pending erase operations initiated by UBIFS finish
> (because these are 2 partitions on the same chip).
>
> I think the quick fix for you would be to avoid calling mtd->sync() in
> mtdblock if the device is R/O - makes no sense anyway.
I had somethng like this in mind, but was unsure about possible side effects.
> Care to submit a
> patch?
I would gladly submit a patch, but I don't know where to get the R/O status.
There is no struct file in this function like in the mtdchar case as Joakim
wrote.
Best regards,
Alexander
--
Dipl.-Inf. Alexander Stein
SYS TEC electronic GmbH
August-Bebel-Str. 29
D-07973 Greiz
Tel: +49-3661-6279-0, Fax: +49-3661-6279-99
eMail: Alexander.Stein@systec-electronic.com
Internet: http://www.systec-electronic.com
Managing Director: Dipl.-Phys. Siegmar Schmidt
Commercial registry: Amtsgericht Jena, HRB 205563
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-10 9:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-04 14:18 delayed close on mtdblock Alexander Stein
2012-01-10 8:54 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-01-10 9:01 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2012-01-10 9:22 ` Alexander Stein [this message]
2012-01-10 9:30 ` Joakim Tjernlund
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4352830.ZIZxnlTurK@ws-stein \
--to=alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com \
--cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).