From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [85.21.88.2] (helo=mail.dev.rtsoft.ru) by canuck.infradead.org with smtp (Exim 4.54 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ESH6d-0006ff-SS for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 12:48:03 -0400 Message-ID: <435678BA.6080809@ru.mvista.com> Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 20:47:54 +0400 From: Vitaly Wool MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nicolas Pitre References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Korolev, Alexey" , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: XIP & GCC optimization & halting List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi, > > >>Now I'm not clear about solution for the problem. >> >> > >Select only one CFI buswidth and only one chip interleave when >configuring your kernel. That will allow gcc to precompute everything a >t compile time and avoid the runtime divide. > > Does it make sense to lock runtime divide functions in i-cache during flash not being in linear mode? Vitaly