From: Sergei Shtylylov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>
To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Konstantin Baidarov <kbaidarov@ru.mvista.com>
Subject: [PATCH] CFI: prevent the false software timeouts on writes
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 21:33:40 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <435E6C74.8010406@ru.mvista.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 939 bytes --]
Hello.
We've noticed that sometimes "MTD do_write_buffer(): software timeout"
message was printed out when writing to a Fujitsu NOR flash.
It turned out that this was because of a race in the timeout handling
do_write_buffer(). A small timeout of (HZ / 1000) + 1 is used there, and
sometimes if the timer interrupt handling takes more than one or even two
jiffies (which is 1-2 ms with HZ == 1000) and that interrupt happens just
after chip_ready() call, the driver bails out from a ready polling loop
despite the chip has actually become ready while all those interrupts were
handled. To deal with this issue, extra check for chip ready is neccessary on
timeout expiration (and the checks should better be reordered).
As do_write_oneword() uses the same approach, it needs to also be changed.
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Baidarov <kbaidarov@ru.mvista.com>
Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>
[-- Attachment #2: cfi_cmdset_0002-write-timeout.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1324 bytes --]
Index: drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/mtd/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c,v
retrieving revision 1.120
diff -a -u -p -r1.120 cfi_cmdset_0002.c
--- drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c 20 Jul 2005 21:01:13 -0000 1.120
+++ drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c 25 Oct 2005 15:38:44 -0000
@@ -1014,16 +1014,16 @@ static int __xipram do_write_oneword(str
continue;
}
- if (chip_ready(map, adr))
- break;
-
- if (time_after(jiffies, timeo)) {
+ if (time_after(jiffies, timeo) && !chip_ready(map, adr)){
xip_enable(map, chip, adr);
printk(KERN_WARNING "MTD %s(): software timeout\n", __func__);
xip_disable(map, chip, adr);
- break;
+ break;
}
+ if (chip_ready(map, adr))
+ break;
+
/* Latency issues. Drop the lock, wait a while and retry */
UDELAY(map, chip, adr, 1);
}
@@ -1275,13 +1275,13 @@ static int __xipram do_write_buffer(stru
continue;
}
+ if (time_after(jiffies, timeo) && !chip_ready(map, adr))
+ break;
+
if (chip_ready(map, adr)) {
xip_enable(map, chip, adr);
goto op_done;
}
-
- if( time_after(jiffies, timeo))
- break;
/* Latency issues. Drop the lock, wait a while and retry */
UDELAY(map, chip, adr, 1);
next reply other threads:[~2005-10-25 17:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-25 17:33 Sergei Shtylylov [this message]
2005-10-31 14:25 ` [PATCH] CFI: prevent the false software timeouts on writes Vitaly Wool
2005-11-07 11:02 ` Vitaly Wool
2005-11-07 13:21 ` Sergei Shtylylov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=435E6C74.8010406@ru.mvista.com \
--to=sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=kbaidarov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox