* [PATCH]erase block header support in JFFS2(revision 6)
@ 2005-11-01 8:25 zhao forrest
2005-11-02 10:55 ` Artem B. Bityutskiy
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: zhao forrest @ 2005-11-01 8:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dedekind, joern; +Cc: linux-mtd
Hi,
This is the 6th version of the patch.
The only change compared with 5th version is:
I replace jffs2_cleanmarker_oob() with jffs2_ebh_oob() to
avoid confusion since cleanmarker is gone.
The patch is at:
http://www.infradead.org/~forrest/eraseblock_header_r6.patch
Your comments are welcome.
Thanks,
Forrest
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH]erase block header support in JFFS2(revision 6)
2005-11-01 8:25 [PATCH]erase block header support in JFFS2(revision 6) zhao forrest
@ 2005-11-02 10:55 ` Artem B. Bityutskiy
2005-11-03 1:48 ` zhao forrest
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Artem B. Bityutskiy @ 2005-11-02 10:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: zhao forrest; +Cc: linux-mtd
zhao forrest wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is the 6th version of the patch.
> The only change compared with 5th version is:
> I replace jffs2_cleanmarker_oob() with jffs2_ebh_oob() to
> avoid confusion since cleanmarker is gone.
>
> The patch is at:
> http://www.infradead.org/~forrest/eraseblock_header_r6.patch
>
I wonder, did you try this on NOR or mtdram?
--
Best Regards,
Artem B. Bityutskiy,
St.-Petersburg, Russia.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH]erase block header support in JFFS2(revision 6)
2005-11-02 10:55 ` Artem B. Bityutskiy
@ 2005-11-03 1:48 ` zhao forrest
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: zhao forrest @ 2005-11-03 1:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dedekind; +Cc: linux-mtd
> > This is the 6th version of the patch.
> > The only change compared with 5th version is:
> > I replace jffs2_cleanmarker_oob() with jffs2_ebh_oob() to
> > avoid confusion since cleanmarker is gone.
>> >
>I wonder, did you try this on NOR or mtdram?
oh, it's my fault to forget to mention the testing status of
this patch.
I tested this patch on NOR, mtdram, nandsim and even Joern's
ramtd.
For NOR, I run LTP for about 4 hours;
for mtdram, nansim and ramtd, I run LTP for about 12 hours.
Also I did many mount/umount tests.
Unitil now, no problem is found.
Thanks,
Forrest
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-11-03 2:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-11-01 8:25 [PATCH]erase block header support in JFFS2(revision 6) zhao forrest
2005-11-02 10:55 ` Artem B. Bityutskiy
2005-11-03 1:48 ` zhao forrest
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox