From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [84.204.75.166] (helo=shelob.oktetlabs.ru) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.54 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1EmRIL-0001H1-B8 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 02:43:34 -0500 Message-ID: <439FBEDF.7000506@yandex.ru> Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 09:42:39 +0300 From: Artem Bityutskiy MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "zhao, forrest" References: <439C33D2.506@yandex.ru> <1134367675.3152.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> <439D5159.4030704@yandex.ru> <1134455209.7346.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20051213114752.GA9165@angel.research.nokia.com> <1134545396.27194.11.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1134545396.27194.11.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Linux MTD , tglx@linutronix.de, Jarkko Lavinen Subject: Re: JFFS2 CVS broken after 2005/11/14 List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , zhao, forrest wrote: >Hi, Artem > >I would change the mail subject to avoid the confusion. > >I did a lot of regression test today....... >1 I checked in the EBH patch on 2005/11/04, so I checked out >CVS snapshot of 2005/11/05. It works very well. >2 I checked in the 1:1 mapping patch on 2005/11/11, so I checked >out CVS snapshot of 2005/11/12. It works very well. >3 I checked out CVS snapshot of 2005/11/13. It works very well. >4 I checked out CVS snapshot of 2005/11/14. There're error >messages like the below posted by Jarkko. > > Actually even without that patch JFFS2 doesn't work. I don't know which regression tests you did, but JFFS2 fails to do simle a thing: mount copy a file unmount mount and it is reproducable on nandsim. Artem.