public inbox for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Scholz <steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de>
To: Peter Menzebach <pm-mtd@mw-itcon.de>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Do I have to umount JFFS2?
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 16:08:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43A57B60.9090203@imc-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43A2F15A.6070407@mw-itcon.de>

Peter,

>> Didnt get this comment of ur's :
>> 1. Single files can be still corrupted, when you write them and press
>> reset.
>>
> When you press reset, when a file is written, you get a partly written
> block. So you get a file, which is not written completely. This
> corruption is detected by jffs2 and issues warnings. The filesystem as
> whole stays intact, but the file as such doesn't have the contents you
> might expect.

Since you're talking about "pressing reset" I have to ask again.

When we do a firmware update of our devices we do something like

 cp /tmp/large_file /opt/imc/application
 reboot

where /tmp is a ramdisk and / a jffs2 rw rootfs.

So we're not pressing reset but doing a reboot. And I wanted to know if
linux does only reboot _after_ all data is correctly written to flash?

Would it make sense to do

 cp /tmp/large_file /opt/imc/application
 sync
 reboot

???

What's the point of having a line

::shutdown:/bin/umount -a -r

in /etc/inittab?

I have

/dev/mtdblock0 on / type jffs2 (rw,noatime)
/proc on /proc type proc (rw,nodiratime)
devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw)
sysfs on /sys type sysfs (rw)
/dev/shm on /var type tmpfs (rw)
/sys/kernel/debug on /var/tmp/debug type debugfs (rw)

So the only real fs is jffs2. Does it help to unmount it before reboot?

--
Steven

  reply	other threads:[~2005-12-18 15:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-12-15 10:12 Do I have to umount JFFS2? Steven Scholz
2005-12-15 10:26 ` Jarkko Lavinen
2005-12-15 12:25   ` Steven Scholz
2005-12-15 12:51     ` Peter Menzebach
2005-12-16  2:16       ` alfred hitch
2005-12-16  9:10         ` Peter Menzebach
2005-12-16 16:36           ` alfred hitch
2005-12-16 16:54             ` Peter Menzebach
2005-12-18 15:08               ` Steven Scholz [this message]
2005-12-19  7:52                 ` Peter Menzebach

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43A57B60.9090203@imc-berlin.de \
    --to=steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=pm-mtd@mw-itcon.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox