From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.wiscore.com ([210.241.236.27] helo=server3.wiscore.com) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.54 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1FBUEB-0000p7-Cb for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 04:54:47 -0500 Message-ID: <43FAE356.2000401@wiscore.com> Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 17:54:30 +0800 From: Robert Liu MIME-Version: 1.0 To: tglx@linutronix.de, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org References: <43FA6A26.8000005@wiscore.com> <1140513914.2480.861.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1140513914.2480.861.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Big5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: do R/W tests on JFFS2 and suffer segmentation fault List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Thomas Gleixner wrote: >Which kernel version ? Any patches related to MTD/JFFS2 applied ? > > I am using the lastest CVS MTD codes. More about the testing platform: Intel IXP-based board (big-endian) with a 32MB 8-bit NAND flash Kernl: linux-2.6.10 There is no patch related to MTD/JFFS2 applied. >Thats the list_head poison code (see include/linux/list.h >LIST_POISON1/2). The entry was removed before. > > tglx > > > Sorry, let me try to descript the testing again. I run the testing script on JFFS2 partitions. When on a real NAND flash, the script always failed (at different iterations, less than 100). But it passed on a nandsim (1000 iterations one time, and more than 500 iterations serveral times). If any information is needed, please tell me. Thanks and Regards, Robert