public inbox for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Artem B. Bityutskiy" <dedekind@yandex.ru>
To: Charles Manning <manningc2@actrix.gen.nz>, tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: William Watson <wjw1961@gmail.com>,
	Vitaly Wool <vwool@ru.mvista.com>,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, yaffs@stoneboat.aleph1.co.uk
Subject: Re: [Yaffs] bit error rates --> a vendor speaks
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 15:14:28 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43FB0424.1020309@yandex.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200602211140.30069.manningc2@actrix.gen.nz>

Charles Manning wrote:
> Sorry Thomas I don't buy that argument. If a system has a NAND device that 
> does have spare OOB available then it does have spare OOB and I can rely on 
> that. If a NAND chip is soldered to a board, and the system exposes the OOB  
> it is there. YAFFS (or whatever) can then be used on this device.

I understand Thomas's point as as he is fighting for generalization. 
Indeed, this OOB stuff introduces a lot of mess.

Charles' point is - if OOB is there, why not to let users use it? Also 
sounds reasonable.

What I think would be nice to do is to get rid of OOB in MTD stuff, but 
add a possibility to access OOB via some NAND-specific interfaces from 
nand_base. Indeed, if one wants to work with a generalized flash device 
- please use MTD interface. If one still wants to access OOB, use 
lower-layer NAND interfaces. That's all about to have more then one 
layer of Generalization. And I believe this is the right way to go.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem B. Bityutskiy,
St.-Petersburg, Russia.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-02-21 12:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <43EB96DC.3030900@eptar.com>
     [not found] ` <35fb2e590602100558s2d868fa3o1752fbf3217439e4@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]   ` <d97046180602151153g23064424x9e1ddf83a1d7ae4f@mail.gmail.com>
2006-02-16  1:32     ` [Yaffs] bit error rates --> a vendor speaks Charles Manning
2006-02-18  9:10       ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-02-18 16:31         ` Vitaly Wool
2006-02-19  8:22           ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-02-20 20:42             ` Charles Manning
2006-02-20 21:37               ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-02-20 22:40                 ` Charles Manning
2006-02-20 23:18                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-02-21  0:29                     ` Jon Masters
2006-02-21  8:26                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-02-21  9:35                         ` Jörn Engel
2006-02-21  1:08                     ` [Yaffs] bit error rates --> YAFFS for devices with no OOB Charles Manning
2006-02-21  2:12                       ` Jon Masters
2006-02-22  0:38                       ` Jamie Lokier
2006-02-21 12:14                   ` Artem B. Bityutskiy [this message]
2006-02-21 13:50                     ` [Yaffs] bit error rates --> a vendor speaks Josh Boyer
2006-02-21 14:36                       ` Artem B. Bityutskiy
2006-02-21 14:49                         ` Artem B. Bityutskiy
2006-02-21 11:59                 ` Artem B. Bityutskiy
2006-02-21 12:06                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-02-25 11:58                     ` Artem B. Bityutskiy
2006-02-27 13:27                       ` Josh Boyer
2006-02-27 16:01                         ` Artem B. Bityutskiy
2006-02-27 16:15                           ` Josh Boyer
2006-02-27 17:21                             ` Artem B. Bityutskiy
2006-02-27 17:40                               ` Josh Boyer
2006-02-18 18:11         ` Russ Dill
2006-02-19  0:29           ` Charles Manning
2006-02-19  5:08             ` Jon Masters
2006-02-19  8:29           ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-02-23  0:46             ` Russ Dill
2006-02-23  7:36               ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-02-23  8:31       ` Vitaly Wool
2006-02-24  9:51         ` Artem B. Bityutskiy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43FB0424.1020309@yandex.ru \
    --to=dedekind@yandex.ru \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=manningc2@actrix.gen.nz \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vwool@ru.mvista.com \
    --cc=wjw1961@gmail.com \
    --cc=yaffs@stoneboat.aleph1.co.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox