From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.wiscore.com ([210.241.236.27] helo=server3.wiscore.com) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.54 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1FCUrq-0000fV-Kv for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2006 23:47:52 -0500 Received: from [192.168.0.75] (milk.wiscore.com [210.241.236.28]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server3.wiscore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 857B211E for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 12:47:35 +0800 (CST) Message-ID: <43FE8FE9.3060507@wiscore.com> Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 12:47:37 +0800 From: Robert Liu MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org References: <43FA6A26.8000005@wiscore.com> <1140513914.2480.861.camel@localhost.localdomain> <43FAE356.2000401@wiscore.com> In-Reply-To: <43FAE356.2000401@wiscore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Big5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: do R/W tests on JFFS2 and suffer segmentation fault List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi, I used the same MTD and JFFS2 codes in linux-2.6.15.1 and re-run tests. The tests passed without any segmentation fault. Can't I use the lastest MTD and JFFS2 codes in an old kernel? Thanks, Robert