From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms01.sssup.it ([193.205.80.99] helo=sssup.it) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1FGyDs-00068B-EH for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 07:57:05 -0500 Message-ID: <440ED49A.2060502@gandalf.sssup.it> Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 13:56:58 +0100 From: Michael Trimarchi MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Josh Boyer References: <20060307200320.vret812nko8k0k4g@feanor.sssup.it> <625fc13d0603071112w2b846443n466c8cc77cb37211@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <625fc13d0603071112w2b846443n466c8cc77cb37211@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: jffs2 List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , s3c2440 128MB nand full file system jffs2 and jffs2+Erase Block Summary (EBS) regards Michael Josh Boyer wrote: >On 3/7/06, trimarchi@gandalf.sssup.it wrote: > > >>Hi all, >>I need to know the order of magnitude of time spent to mount a NAND of 128MB >>using a jffs2 filesystem. >> >> > >That's a pretty vague question, so I'll give you a vague answer: > >It will take less than 3 years to mount a NAND of 126MiB using a JFFS2 >filesystem. > >If you specify more information, perhaps you'll get a better answer. >Things like the type of processor, the type of NAND flash, how full >the filesystem is, whether or not the Summary option is on, etc. all >have a direct impact to your question. > >josh > >______________________________________________________ >Linux MTD discussion mailing list >http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/ > > >