From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [84.204.75.166] (helo=shelob.oktetlabs.ru) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.54 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1FHjmO-0007mi-PS for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 10:43:56 -0500 Message-ID: <44119E8F.1000504@yandex.ru> Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 18:43:11 +0300 From: "Artem B. Bityutskiy" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Josh Boyer References: <20060310135431.62022.qmail@web86903.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <625fc13d0603100735o37c96bcfl78b213eab41b5e54@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <625fc13d0603100735o37c96bcfl78b213eab41b5e54@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Nicolas Pitre , Adam Ward Subject: Re: Read only forced on jffs2 by mtd layer? List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Josh Boyer wrote: > Also, does your JFFS2 filesystem have free space available? If a > minimum amount of free eraseblocks are not present, JFFS2 will mark > itself as read-only no matter what you do. > Hmm, is this sane behaviour? -- Best Regards, Artem B. Bityutskiy, St.-Petersburg, Russia.