From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [85.21.88.6] (helo=buildserver.ru.mvista.com) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1FM5XK-0003z8-9T for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 10:46:30 -0500 Message-ID: <44217124.20607@ru.mvista.com> Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 18:45:40 +0300 From: Vitaly Wool MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexander Belyakov References: <1142953764.13740.0.camel@sauron.oktetlabs.ru> <442041BE.9070407@intel.com> <1142967444.13740.9.camel@sauron.oktetlabs.ru> <442111B5.6090308@yandex.ru> <442161C3.80604@intel.com> <1143038877.29683.10.camel@sauron.oktetlabs.ru> <442168D3.70302@intel.com> <1143040557.29683.14.camel@sauron.oktetlabs.ru> <44216F99.9040304@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <44216F99.9040304@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Korolev, Alexey" , Nicolas Pitre , "Kutergin, Timofey" , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Linux MTD striping middle layer List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Alexander, Alexander Belyakov wrote: > it is RFC. I have no doubts that other misunderstandings and > reasonable requests for code change will arise. At the moment I see > two: 1 - remove some artificial limitations for number of devices to > be striped, and 2 - insmod parameters change from device name to > device number. I'll fix them along with other things before posting > patch next time. May I ask why at all you need to add a new mechanism for striping iso, say, modifying mtdconcat? Thanks! Vitaly