From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88] helo=fmsmga101-1.fm.intel.com) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1FPDvU-0006ah-II for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 02:20:24 -0500 Message-ID: <442CD81F.5020702@intel.com> Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 11:19:59 +0400 From: Alexander Belyakov MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nicolas Pitre References: <1143714902.3579.31.camel@sauron.oktetlabs.ru> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Korolev, Alexey" , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, "Kutergin, Timofey" Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] MTD: Striping layer core List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Nicolas Pitre wrote: > While NOR flash can indeed write one byte (or even one bit) at a time, > it is not really useful, not in the context of stripe at least. The NOR > write buffer size is a much more useful metric. That was mentioned in documentation for striping layer core. "For NOR devices the bottom border for interleave size is defined by flash buffer size". But anyway I think it is worth to mention that interleave size in general case can be less than buffer size.