From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21] helo=azsmga101-1.ch.intel.com) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1FPF68-0000hP-Pn for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 03:35:20 -0500 Message-ID: <442CE9B6.7040008@intel.com> Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 12:35:02 +0400 From: Alexander Belyakov MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Artem B. Bityutskiy" References: <20060330121156.GA31749@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> <442CD1CB.7050509@intel.com> <442CE0E8.1080105@yandex.ru> <442CE431.5050700@intel.com> <442CE8ED.2020501@yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <442CE8ED.2020501@yandex.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Korolev, Alexey" , "Kutergin, Timofey" , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] MTD: Striping layer core List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Artem B. Bityutskiy wrote: > Alexander Belyakov wrote: >> I followed the already existing example for partitions.h in the same >> mphysmap.c file. Just thought it's OK. I'll try to fix that, thanks. > > You know, Linux is eveloping, and older code is not always the best > coding example. If you read LKML, you should have noticed how strict > people are, a lot of those patches which would had been accepted in > the past are blamed and rejected now. And this is normal IMO, people > study on their own mistakes. > That's OK. I see no problems here. I'll fix that.