From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [84.204.75.166] (helo=shelob.oktetlabs.ru) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.54 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1FQhMR-0003ec-Ix for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 04 Apr 2006 04:58:12 -0400 Message-ID: <443234FB.5040708@yandex.ru> Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 12:57:31 +0400 From: "Artem B. Bityutskiy" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn_Engel?= References: <20060329232520.1677d2b3.akpm@osdl.org> <442C0494.2040609@zytor.com> <20060330114014.53150d1b.akpm@osdl.org> <442C6B78.3060706@zytor.com> <4431E304.6020908@zytor.com> <20060404083019.GA9747@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> <4432318E.5050002@yandex.ru> <20060404084659.GA11384@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> In-Reply-To: <20060404084659.GA11384@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Linux MTD Subject: Re: blkmtd and name_to_dev_t List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , J=F6rn Engel wrote: > Artem, this is the other way around. You are talking about having a > fake block device to mount jffs2 on mtd. mtd->bd Yes yes. I said "This is a bit out of context and I'm not arguing". I just noticed that the whole confusion came form these "mtdblock"=20 devices... Sorry if I'm wrong. --=20 Best Regards, Artem B. Bityutskiy, St.-Petersburg, Russia.