From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <443503D3.3030409@netwinder.org> Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 08:04:35 -0400 From: Ralph Siemsen MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Vrabel References: <4433E9A1.1030807@netwinder.org> <1144254468.6227.84.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <4433F9FE.7020501@rossvideo.com> <1144258058.6227.90.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <44340038.3000602@netwinder.org> <20060405190525.GE20310@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> <4434EE85.60809@arcom.com> In-Reply-To: <4434EE85.60809@arcom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn_Engel?= , David Woodhouse Subject: Re: FAQ entry for loopback mounting List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , David Vrabel wrote: > It's "Ki" not "ki". Indeed, though this is only a IEC standard and not part of SI. They write "For consistency with the other prefixes for binary multiples, the symbol Ki is used for 2^10 rather than ki." Of course this only opens the door to even more end-user confusion. -R