From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20] helo=orsmga101-1.jf.intel.com) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.61 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1FZ6p1-0003YO-3M for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 09:46:23 -0400 Message-ID: <4450CB21.1010604@intel.com> Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 17:46:09 +0400 From: Alexander Belyakov MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nicolas Pitre References: <445081B4.8070801@intel.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] MTD: mtdconcat NAND/Sibley support List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > Which means you have to copy data into your page, which is against the > point of writev(). If you're copying data into a separate page in order > to use write() then JFFS2 could simply do it itself and writev() > eliminated entirely. > I've got your point. Thanks, Alexander ------- The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue.