From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [85.21.88.2] (helo=mail.dev.rtsoft.ru) by canuck.infradead.org with smtp (Exim 4.62 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1FeTNz-0004Eg-0N for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 12 May 2006 04:52:42 -0400 Message-ID: <44644CE7.6060909@ru.mvista.com> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 12:52:55 +0400 From: Vitaly Wool MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Russ Dill References: <4461B7CD.9010100@ru.mvista.com> <625fc13d0605100400t458ab59enbd36f70c90e10b2e@mail.gmail.com> <4461CC8C.6010105@ru.mvista.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Josh Boyer , Linux-MTD Mailing List Subject: Re: [RFC] read-only filesystem support for NAND flash devices List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Russ Dill wrote: > Free block list? Bad block list? Tracking of block numbers? Sounds > like a full on FTL to me. I'd rather go modifying mtdblock_ro. I don't want to implement FTL because 1) as David pointed out, I don't need to handle writes; 2) I'm afraid we may end up dealing with patent issues here again. Vitaly