From: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: struct jffs2_xattr_datum/jffs2_xattr_ref/jffs2_inode_cache
Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 13:05:00 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <447289EC.5060808@ak.jp.nec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1148351162.10288.58.camel@shinybook.infradead.org>
>> By the way, I have a question about an usage for jffs2_reserve_space().
>>
>> Is it permitted to allocate a space for multi nodes by a single
>> calling of jffs2_reserve_space()?
>> I tried to allocate a space for xattr_datum and xattr_ref by a single
>> calling of jffs2_reserve_space(), and it seems to work without any
>> troubles.
>
> Yes, it works. But if you have space for just the xattr_datum at the end
> of the eraseblock, it's better to write that in the available space and
> then write the xattr_ref to the next eraseblock.
OK, I agreed an increasion of wasted size should be avoided if possible.
> By the way, we should implement support for retrying writes in
> save_xattr_datum() and save_xattr_ref(). See how jffs2_write_dnode() and
> jffs2_write_dirent() do it, for example.
When we implement support for retrying write in those functions,
xattr_sem must be released once at least. If there is no problem
related to exclusion, I'll adopt retrying approach.
Currently, I'm checking whether it's safe or not.
Thanks,
--
Open Source Software Promotion Center, NEC
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-23 4:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-22 15:36 struct jffs2_xattr_datum/jffs2_xattr_ref/jffs2_inode_cache David Woodhouse
2006-05-23 2:01 ` KaiGai Kohei
2006-05-23 2:26 ` David Woodhouse
2006-05-23 4:05 ` KaiGai Kohei [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=447289EC.5060808@ak.jp.nec.com \
--to=kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox