From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [84.204.75.166] (helo=shelob.oktetlabs.ru) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.62 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Fl6Ke-0007Z7-9l for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 30 May 2006 11:41:26 -0400 Message-ID: <447C6747.2080104@yandex.ru> Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 19:39:51 +0400 From: "Artem B. Bityutskiy" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn_Engel?= References: <20060530152406.GA15284@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> In-Reply-To: <20060530152406.GA15284@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, David Woodhouse Subject: Re: [PATCH,RFC] [MTD] replace MTD_NORFLASH with MTD_GENERIC_TYPE List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , J=F6rn Engel wrote: > This patch is 90% uncontroversial. The remaining 10% introduce a new > field to struct mtd_info. Looks like we need something similar to > this patch, but probably not identical to it. Please, explain what does this MTD_GENERIC_TYPE mean? MTD_NORFLASH means = that this is NOR flash. What's MTD_GENERIC_TYPE? And why it "looks like we need something similar to this patch"? --=20 Best Regards, Artem B. Bityutskiy, St.-Petersburg, Russia.