From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [82.179.117.26] (helo=shelob.oktetlabs.ru) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.62 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1G7RoV-0004GD-VO for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 03:03:51 -0400 Message-ID: <44CDAB1D.3010708@yandex.ru> Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 11:02:53 +0400 From: "Artem B. Bityutskiy" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Josh Boyer Subject: Re: question: the performance of jffs2 on UBI References: <49eab5c80607270530j469f2585w45fbe1d6449c2921@mail.gmail.com> <44C8BD55.3040604@yandex.ru> <44C8C07D.2050909@yandex.ru> <625fc13d0607301034i40bd9583na4c8c6fa2c0f4230@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <625fc13d0607301034i40bd9583na4c8c6fa2c0f4230@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: falls huang , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Josh Boyer wrote: > Just a note, you lose compression if you do that. AFAIK, jffs2 is the > only in-kernel filesystem that supports transparent read/write > compression. > Yeah, that's true. Although Reiser4 claims t osupport it. Nevertheless, I didn't try it. -- Best Regards, Artem B. Bityutskiy, St.-Petersburg, Russia.