From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [85.21.88.2] (helo=mail.dev.rtsoft.ru) by canuck.infradead.org with smtp (Exim 4.62 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1G7Tpv-0007cc-UN for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 05:13:25 -0400 Message-ID: <44CDC9AB.8020406@ru.mvista.com> Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 13:13:15 +0400 From: Vitaly Wool MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marteo Tim Subject: Re: about using UBI on MLC Nand flash References: <91b24a870607272033n1fa43a45vb523982186708f8e@mail.gmail.com> <44C9BA59.7030006@yandex.ru> <91b24a870607310205w7fa0d847wb652da7a1b0c52c7@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <91b24a870607310205w7fa0d847wb652da7a1b0c52c7@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Artem B. Bityutskiy" , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Marteo Tim wrote: > Due to cheap price, MLC NAND flash maybe use more and more popular, > especially in bulky flash. Yaffs2 can already support MLC chips by > zero page rewrites, and I want UBI can support it too. :) > Absolutely, and also it'd be nice to see JFFS2 being MLC-ready, as opposed to its current status... Vitaly