From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [85.21.88.2] (helo=mail.dev.rtsoft.ru) by canuck.infradead.org with smtp (Exim 4.62 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Gm83b-0003b4-Fg for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 07:15:42 -0500 Message-ID: <45619C60.7070400@ru.mvista.com> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:15:28 +0300 From: Vitaly Wool MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dedekind@infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] [MTD] BLOCK_RO: Readonly Block Device Layer Over MTD References: <20061117184055.569da7ad@localhost.localdomain> <1163855713.5597.70.camel@sauron> <1163856784.20835.2.camel@zod.rchland.ibm.com> <1163856955.5597.71.camel@sauron> In-Reply-To: <1163856955.5597.71.camel@sauron> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, kbaidarov List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > On Sat, 2006-11-18 at 07:33 -0600, Josh Boyer wrote: > >> Because we've consistently told people not to do that. >> > > OK, but why ? > > B/c it introduces new fields in generic mtd structures which are already overcomplicated, and modifies a lot of generic code. I'd expect that with this patch applied stuff like mtdcore.c and mtdpart.c becomes exposed to possible licensing issues which is definitely not what we aim ;-) Vitaly