From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.artecdesign.ee ([62.65.32.9] helo=postikukk.artecdesign.ee) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.63 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1GxMLd-0003FZ-PC for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 06:44:35 -0500 Received: from malvek.artecdesign.ee ([62.65.32.4] helo=[192.168.100.183]) by postikukk.artecdesign.ee with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GxMNA-0001su-U1 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 13:46:20 +0200 Message-ID: <458A73AF.2040307@artecdesign.ee> Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 13:44:47 +0200 From: Indrek Kruusa MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Transfer rates with NAND Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi, I am wondering which NAND transfer rates are seen in embedded Linux projects. What to expect from the whole hardware/software subsystem? I have one Geode LX design with CS5536 companion chip which by using built-in 8-bit Flash controller on PCI bus gives me slightly over 2MB/s. It's almost the same with Linux MTD driver and with a self-made basic driver. Is the speed here the matter of flash controller only? Which is the fastest flash controller out there? :) thanks in advance, Indrek