From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([131.228.20.171] helo=mgw-ext12.nokia.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.63 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1HRAJO-0004z7-Pv for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 16:57:25 +0000 Message-ID: <45F6D46C.8030100@nokia.com> Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 18:42:20 +0200 From: Artem Bityutskiy MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ext Alexander Schmidt Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] UBI: rewrite of sysfs.c References: <200703131610.20161.alexs@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <200703131610.20161.alexs@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Thomas Gleixner , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , Frank Haverkamp Reply-To: Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Alexander Schmidt wrote: > Hi, > > I rewrote the sysfs interface to use struct device instead of struct > class_device. This implies an interface change, as sysfs files are now > ordered in a different manner: > > /sys/class/ubi/ubiX/ for device files > /sys/class/ubi/ubiX_Y/ for volumes > > Before we had > > /sys/class/ubi/ubiX/ for device files > /sys/class/ubi/ubiX/Y/ for volumes > > Please let me know if you got any objections on this or if you have > proposals for a better implementation. > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Schmidt It seems we cannot preserve old sysfs structure... It is fine with me. You and Thomas are the main users, so if it is ok with you - lets' apply this. Thomas? -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)