From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from gum.itee.uq.edu.au ([130.102.66.1]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.63 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1HYBoI-0005D1-5G for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 01 Apr 2007 21:58:20 -0400 Message-ID: <461057B4.8030209@itee.uq.edu.au> Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 11:09:08 +1000 From: John Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, uClinux development list Subject: ENOENT creating /dev/root on MTD RAM partition Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hello, I'm working on the 2.6 kernel for MicroBlaze (embedded, NOMMU) arch. Like some other nommu archs, we typically mount root on an MTD RAM partition (either CRAMFS or ROMFS). All of this is working fine on 2.6.19 plus SnapGear 2.6.19-uc0-bigpatch NOMMU patchset. However, since coming forward to 2.6.20 (plus equiv. SnapGear patchset) mount_root is failing. Details follow, but basically create_dev(/dev/root, ROOT_DEV) is returning -ENOENT. ROOT_DEV points to a valid MTD RAM partition, with a valid ROMFS (or CRAMFS, doesn't matter which) image. I've dumped the memory, the image is good. Googling the various archives finds one or two past references to create_dev or do_mount_root returning -ENOENT on MTD RAM partitions, but I found no followups or solutions posted. From my bootlog: uclinux[mtd]: RAM probe address=0x22182cc8 size=0x21d000 Creating 1 MTD partitions on "RAM": 0x00000000-0x0021d000 : "ROMfs" mtd: Giving out device 5 to ROMfs uclinux[mtd]: set ROMfs to be root filesystem index=5 ... ((my debug output in namei.c)) hello from __link_walk_path(/dev/root) __link_walk_path says -ENOENT next:0x23ff4694 next.dentry:0x23e12d08 ... Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(31,5) <0>Rebooting in 120 seconds..Machine restart... I traced down into fs/namei.c - it's a fragment in __link_path_walk("/dev/root"): line 892: /* This does the actual lookups.. */ err = do_lookup(nd, &this, &next); if (err) break; err = -ENOENT; inode = next.dentry->d_inode; if (!inode) { ---> we are hitting this error path goto out_dput; } So, it seems that do_lookup is returning a dentry with no inode. I've tried this with both ROMFS and CRAMFS types, with the same result. If it was a random memory corruption event I'd expect to see different failure modes for the two filesystem types. Any comments or suggestions on a possible cause or approach to track it down would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, John