From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtpout04-01.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net ([64.202.165.196]) by canuck.infradead.org with smtp (Exim 4.63 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ISxe6-0002oL-MJ for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2007 12:22:30 -0400 Message-ID: <46DED80E.5000802@techmoninc.com> Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 11:23:42 -0500 From: Andy Kennedy MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: backtrace.S & printk() References: <46DED5D3.7080502@techmoninc.com> <20070905111743.0313e6b1@weaponx.rchland.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20070905111743.0313e6b1@weaponx.rchland.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Josh Boyer wrote: > On Wed, 05 Sep 2007 11:14:11 -0500 > Andy Kennedy wrote: > > >> Russel: >> >> While attempting to build a kernel without printk in it, I ran across an >> error in your backtrace.S file. It appears that you are assuming that >> all arm kernels will be built with printk(). What is your reason for >> this? What are the ramifications of me taking out those three sections >> of code? >> > > Erm... wrong list? This is the MTD list, not the ARM list... > > josh > > ______________________________________________________ > Linux MTD discussion mailing list > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/ > > > Oh please. . . Linux-ARM Linux-MTD. . . it's all the same. Bummer man. . . been a loooong week. Andy