From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.semihalf.com ([83.15.139.206]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.68 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1JCtbs-00039q-B9 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 10 Jan 2008 09:22:06 +0000 Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mail.semihalf.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 801CA14576 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:27:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.semihalf.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.semihalf.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18549-04 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:27:53 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4785E372.9010409@semihalf.com> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:20:50 +0100 From: Bartlomiej Sieka MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][MTD] Fix incorrect interface code for x16/x32 chips References: <20071126175517.GA1221@frozen.semihalf.com> <4755E020.4070702@semihalf.com> In-Reply-To: <4755E020.4070702@semihalf.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Bartlomiej Sieka wrote: > Bartlomiej Sieka wrote: >> According to "Common Flash Memory Interface Publication 100" dated >> December 1, 2001, the interface code for x16/x32 chips is 0x0005, >> and not 0x0004 used so far. >> >> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Sieka > > I'd appreciate some feedback on the status of this patch. Hmm, it's been over a month now since the patch has been posted, and there haven't been any comments, acceptance/rejection notices, etc. Is this a wrong list to post this patch? Did I miss some formal requirement or something? Are people just too busy? Regards, Bartlomiej