From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.semihalf.com ([83.15.139.206]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.68 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1JDLny-0006VH-SA for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 15:28:29 +0000 Message-ID: <47878AD4.2070204@semihalf.com> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:27:16 +0100 From: Bartlomiej Sieka MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Woodhouse Subject: Re: [PATCH][MTD] Fix incorrect interface code for x16/x32 chips References: <20071126175517.GA1221@frozen.semihalf.com> <4755E020.4070702@semihalf.com> <4785E372.9010409@semihalf.com> <1200003063.2954.4.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <1200003063.2954.4.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , David Woodhouse wrote: [...] >>>> According to "Common Flash Memory Interface Publication 100" dated >>>> December 1, 2001, the interface code for x16/x32 chips is 0x0005, >>>> and not 0x0004 used so far. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Sieka [...] > Sorry. As Jörn said, I tend to apply patches in bursts. When the merge > window is about to open I try to make sure I catch up. I've applied your > patch now. OK, thanks. > > Sending it on my girlfriend's birthday and then following up on my > birthday isn't the best way to make sure I pay attention, fwiw :) Ah, I've marked my calendar now :) Cheers, Bartlomiej