From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from outbound-mail-13.bluehost.com ([69.89.18.113]) by bombadil.infradead.org with smtp (Exim 4.68 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1JS5VM-0008OG-Dc for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 07:06:04 +0000 Message-ID: <47BD22D0.9060008@dlasys.net> Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 02:05:52 -0500 From: "David H. Lynch Jr." MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linuxppc-embedded , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd Subject: Block devices Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sometime recently it seems to have become possible to disable the whole block device subsystem. Though in my tests I can't quit build with it disabled. Anyway, for an embedded device this might be appealing. how does this interact with initramfs and flash ? Can I boot an initramfs kernel without a block device ? Can I write a filesystem driver for a flash device that does not require a block device ? Are their any examples of something even close ? -- Dave Lynch DLA Systems Software Development: Embedded Linux 717.627.3770 dhlii@dlasys.net http://www.dlasys.net fax: 1.253.369.9244 Cell: 1.717.587.7774 Over 25 years' experience in platforms, languages, and technologies too numerous to list. "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." Albert Einstein