From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]) by bombadil.infradead.org with smtp (Exim 4.68 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1JoMBg-00010Z-Cx for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:21:48 +0000 Message-ID: <480E1EA8.9040101@gmx.net> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 19:21:44 +0200 From: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Woodhouse Subject: Re: [PATCH] [MTD] [RESEND] MAPS: add support for Nvidia MCP55 to ck804xrom References: <478E1880.2040609@gmx.net> <1208884343.9212.633.camel@pmac.infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <1208884343.9212.633.camel@pmac.infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Linux mtd List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 22.04.2008 19:12, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 15:45 +0100, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > >> [PATCH] [MTD] MAPS: add support for Nvidia MCP55 to ck804xrom >> >> This patch extends the existing MAPS driver for the Nvidia CK804 chipset >> (ck804xrom.c) to also work on the Nvidia MCP55 chipset. As both chipsets >> are rather similar, suporting them both with the same driver is easy. >> >> The patch is not ready for inclusion yet, it needs some codingstyle care >> and probably better comments. The indenting is wrong at some points to >> keep the diff minimal for a first review. I will post a better version >> once I get some comments. >> > > I fixed that and applied it anyway. > Thank you! >> + { PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, 0x0363, >> + PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 2 }, /* nvidia mcp55 */ >> + { PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, 0x0364, >> + PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 2 }, /* nvidia mcp55 */ >> + { PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, 0x0365, >> + PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 2 }, /* nvidia mcp55 */ >> + { PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, 0x0366, >> + PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 2 }, /* nvidia mcp55 */ >> + { PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, 0x03607, >> + PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 2 }, /* nvidia mcp55 */ >> > > I fixed that too; I assume the last ID should have been 0x367? > Indeed, my bad. Regards, Carl-Daniel