From: Adrian Hunter <ext-adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
To: ext Nancy <nancydreaming@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mtd <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: UBI: badblock management confusion!
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:58:21 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4815BBDD.4090004@nokia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bae050c10804280450g591c74bfn711f668863b693f1@mail.gmail.com>
ext Nancy wrote:
>>> Oh, thank you for ponting out my mistake!
>>> You mean UBI admit the amount of current badblocks are part of
>>> reserved PEBs, right?
>>>
>> Not exactly. It is just that UBI does not mind if there are not enough
>> PEBs to meet the number desired for bad-block handling.
>>
>>> If the answer is yes, then the volume size I'm goting to create should
>>> be equal to
>>>
>>> (total number of PEB this ubi device has - total number of reserved
>>> PEBs) * LEB size
>>>
>>> not what UBI think:
>>> (number of good PEBs - total number of reserved PEBs) * LEB size
>>>
>>> Am I right?
>>>
>> I am not sure what you are trying to achieve. You can always use
>> the -m option of ubimkvol to set volume size to maximum available size.
>>
> Let me clarify the problem I met:
> there are so many Nand flash for burning. Each one of them may have
> different numbers of badblocks, but that number do not exceed the reserved
> badblock number. Each one of them should have the same maximum avaliable
> volume size. But the practice tell no, the maximum avaliable volume size
> effect by number of badblocks the current MTD partition has. That's wrong.
> You can try by yourself.
>
The following section from UBI documentation may help you:
http://linux-mtd.infradead.org/doc/ubi.html#L_autoresize
Let us know if it doesn't meet your needs.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-28 12:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-25 6:54 UBI: badblock management confusion! Nancy
2008-04-25 10:47 ` Adrian Hunter
2008-04-25 12:08 ` Nancy
2008-04-25 12:12 ` Nancy
2008-04-28 7:59 ` Adrian Hunter
2008-04-28 11:45 ` Nancy
2008-04-28 7:57 ` Adrian Hunter
2008-04-28 11:50 ` Nancy
2008-04-28 11:58 ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
2008-04-28 12:24 ` Nancy
2008-04-28 14:08 ` Adrian Hunter
2008-04-29 2:06 ` Nancy
2008-04-30 9:14 ` Adrian Hunter
2008-05-04 1:42 ` Nancy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4815BBDD.4090004@nokia.com \
--to=ext-adrian.hunter@nokia.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=nancydreaming@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox