From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.9]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.68 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1K5PGp-0006MJ-R7 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 08 Jun 2008 18:05:36 +0000 Message-ID: <484C1F6C.9000108@grandegger.com> Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2008 20:05:32 +0200 From: Wolfgang Grandegger MIME-Version: 1.0 To: avorontsov@ru.mvista.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] [NAND] driver extension to support NAND on TQM85xx modules References: <4847A8DA.6010406@grandegger.com> <1212825701.32207.403.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <20080607114438.GA23329@polina.dev.rtsoft.ru> In-Reply-To: <20080607114438.GA23329@polina.dev.rtsoft.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, David Woodhouse , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Anton Vorontsov wrote: > On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 09:01:41AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: >> On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 10:50 +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: >>> [NAND] driver extension to support NAND on TQM85xx modules >>> >>> This patch extends the FSL UPM NAND driver from Anton Vorontsov to >>> support NAND on the TQM85xx modules. Unfortunately, the hardware does >>> not support the R/B pins of the NAND chip and therefore the specified >>> maximum delay time must used. It therefore re-introduces the chip-delay >>> property. >>> >>> Note: this patch is based on various patches from Anton Vorontsov posted >>> to this list: >>> >>> http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2008-April/055587.html. >> Do you also want me to apply that patch (on which this one depends)? >> It says 'Signed-off-by: not yet' ... > > Well, I have no objections to applying that patch, feel free to add my > sign off. But if OF people will NAK the bindings, I'll have to bother you > once again with the update to that driver. :-/ > > I've tried to push the bindings several times already, and always there > were [absolutely legitimate] issues. The last RFC is here (along with > other new bindings): > > http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2008-June/057244.html > > so far no comments.. Probably a good sign. :-) I see. I think I should then also post the bindings (update of booting-without-of.txt) separately. Wolfgang.