From: Adrian Hunter <ext-adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
To: Zhao Forrest <forrest.zhao@gmail.com>
Cc: Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: A question about UBIFS
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 09:34:42 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <484F7202.1010701@nokia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ac8af0be0806102116l5918c48ax279d456b4de1d061@mail.gmail.com>
Zhao Forrest wrote:
> Hi Artem,
Artem is on holiday til next week.
> I have a basic question about NAND flash page update in UBIFS/UBI,
> take the following as an example:
> 1 a NAND flash with page size of 4KB, erase block size of 256KB, so
> there're 64 pages within an erase block
> 2 page 0 - page 10 has invalid data content, page 11 - page 63 has
> valid data content from FS's point of view
> 3 UBIFS attempts to update(or rewrite) page 11
UBIFS does out-of-place updates. It never tries to update or rewrite
page 11. (Well, except in very rare circumstances that are not worth
going into)
> My question is how page 11 is updated by UBIFS/UBI?
As far as UBIFS goes, you need to learn about wandering trees and
garbage collection.
> I only read the design docs of UBI and guess that for this particular
> case a new physical eraseblock is got by UBI, then new content of page
> 11 is written to page 11 of new physical eraseblock, page 12 - page 63
> in original physical eraseblock are copied to new physical eraseblock,
> lastly the mapping between logical eraseblock and physical eraseblock
> is updated. Am I right?
Not for UBIFS.
> I know I omit many details in UBIFS/UBI for this updating operation.
> I'd like to know the cost of rewrite in UBIFS/UBI.
UBIFS rewrite is typically better than even JFFS2 - see
http://osl.sed.hu/wiki/ubifs/index.php/IOzone
Of course that assumes you are sync.ing the data. UBIFS has writeback
which means rewrites will be much faster if you do not need to have
the data sync'ed.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-11 6:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-11 4:16 A question about UBIFS Zhao Forrest
2008-06-11 6:34 ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
2008-06-11 7:56 ` Zhao Forrest
2008-06-11 8:19 ` Nancy
2008-06-16 6:42 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2008-06-16 7:16 ` Zhao Forrest
2008-06-16 9:21 ` Artem Bityutskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=484F7202.1010701@nokia.com \
--to=ext-adrian.hunter@nokia.com \
--cc=Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com \
--cc=forrest.zhao@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox